In version 5.0pre1, alt+f was bound to the filter text box. Now it is bound to the "find" button. However, the "find" button has a binding to "enter". Requesting that alt+f be unbound from the "find" button, as this conflicts with the "fitler" text box alt+f binding.
Submitted | ross-rogers - 2013-08-08 - 21:55:49z | Assigned | vampire0 |
---|---|---|---|
Priority | 5 | Category | search and replace |
Status | Open | Group | None |
Resolution | None | Visibility | No |
2013-08-09 - 15:36:23z ezust |
committed 23105 |
---|---|
2013-08-27 - 22:07:49z vampire0 |
As discussed on the devel list, removing the whloe mnemonic just because there is a clash in one l10n is not the right way and breaks it for others. Instead a unique mnemonic has to be found or added like for chinese menu mnemonics. |
2013-08-27 - 22:28:51z ross-rogers |
I'm sorry, I couldn't find the devel list discussion, (link anyone?) However, does the search button need two bindings? If you remove the letter-based hotkey, the search button is still bound to <enter> Don't all keyboards have the <enter> key? |
2013-08-29 - 23:16:25z vampire0 |
Sure: https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAKChYSprjrMrqTA9ZWGOxz6MvgiDGR7eBbZdyu9btN37brRoRg%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=jedit-devel There it was started and then continued in private by Alan Maybe all keyboards do But are you sure all look and feels bound the Enter key to the default button no matter what button has the focus? Besides that people could be used to using a shorcut in the other localizations and just because there is a clash in one it shouldn't be removed from all of them. |
2013-08-08 - 21:55:50z ross-rogers |
search_hotkey_bindings.png Screenshots of before and after. |
---|